During his continued cross-examination in the trial regarding his claim of being the inventor of Bitcoin, Craig Wright vehemently criticised "experts" for their inability to verify their work, asserting that possession of private keys does not validate his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto. Wright faced intense scrutiny over a public blog post he allegedly cryptographically signed to prove his identity as Satoshi, which experts have debunked as a hoax. He argued that identity cannot be proven solely through possession of keys but rather through knowledge and work. The cross-examination, marked by tension and interventions from the presiding judge, continued for a full day, with Wright emphasising the security risk to his work rather than the potential compromise of private keys.